@article {493,
	title = {Deep sequencing reveals unique small RNA repertoire that is regulated during head regeneration in Hydra magnipapillata. [Next Generation Genomics facility]},
	journal = {Nucleic Acids Res},
	volume = {41},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013 Jan 07},
	pages = {599-616},
	abstract = {<p class="rtejustify">Small non-coding RNAs such as miRNAs, piRNAs and endo-siRNAs fine-tune gene expression through post-transcriptional regulation, modulating important processes in development, differentiation, homeostasis and regeneration. Using deep sequencing, we have profiled small non-coding RNAs in Hydra magnipapillata and investigated changes in small RNA expression pattern during head regeneration. Our results reveal a unique repertoire of small RNAs in hydra. We have identified 126 miRNA loci; 123 of these miRNAs are unique to hydra. Less than 50\% are conserved across two different strains of Hydra vulgaris tested in this study, indicating a highly diverse nature of hydra miRNAs in contrast to bilaterian miRNAs. We also identified siRNAs derived from precursors with perfect stem-loop structure and that arise from inverted repeats. piRNAs were the most abundant small RNAs in hydra, mapping to transposable elements, the annotated transcriptome and unique non-coding regions on the genome. piRNAs that map to transposable elements and the annotated transcriptome display a ping-pong signature. Further, we have identified several miRNAs and piRNAs whose expression is regulated during hydra head regeneration. Our study defines different classes of small RNAs in this cnidarian model system, which may play a role in orchestrating gene expression essential for hydra regeneration.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Head, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Hydra, MicroRNAs, Regeneration, RNA, Small Interfering, RNA, Small Untranslated, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Transcriptome},
	issn = {1362-4962},
	doi = {10.1093/nar/gks1020},
	author = {Krishna, Srikar and Nair, Aparna and Cheedipudi, Sirisha and Poduval, Deepak and Dhawan, Jyotsna and Palakodeti, Dasaradhi and Ghanekar, Yashoda}
}
@article {478,
	title = {Functional implementation of Drosophila itpr mutants by rat Itpr1. [Drosophila facility]},
	journal = {J Neurogenet},
	volume = {26},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012 Sep},
	pages = {328-37},
	abstract = {<p class="rtejustify">The Drosophila inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP(3)R) and mammalian type-1 IP(3)Rs have 57-60\% sequence similarity and share major domain homology with each other. Mutants in the single Drosophila IP(3)R gene, itpr, and Itpr1 knockout mice both exhibit lethality and defects in motor coordination. Here the authors show that the rat type-1 IP(3)R, which is the major neuronal isoform, when expressed in the pan-neuronal domain in Drosophila, functionally complements Drosophila IP(3)R function at cellular and systemic levels. It rescues the established neuronal phenotypes of itpr mutants in Drosophila, including wing posture, flight, electrophysiological correlates of flight maintenance, and intracellular calcium dynamics. This is the first in vivo demonstration of functional homology between a mammalian and fly IP(3)R. This study also paves the way for cellular and molecular analyses of the spinocerebellar ataxias in Drosophila, since SCA15/16 is known to be caused by heterozygosity of human ITPR1.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Calcium, Cells, Cultured, Cytosol, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Flight, Animal, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetic Therapy, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors, Larva, Movement Disorders, Mutation, Neurons, Physical Stimulation, Rats, Transcription Factors, Wings, Animal},
	issn = {1563-5260},
	doi = {10.3109/01677063.2012.697501},
	author = {Chakraborty, Sumita and Hasan, Gaiti}
}
